Featured Books
National Socialism: Yesterday & Today
National Socialism Yesterday and Today is a radical book, but it is one that someone has needed to write for decades. In this small but powerful book, author and philosopher William A. White discusses national socialism as political philosophy that in its purest essence brings order to the state while empowering and enriching-culturally and financially-the state and its people at the same time. This is the direct antithesis of the American state today which punishes its people with police state brutality, steals their money through unfair forms of taxation, listens in on every possible private communication, tortures those who rise up against it and generally turns the natural order upside down. But national socialism is not an invention of the modern era. There were great leaders of the past who employed their version of national socialist theory while they reigned. These men were few and far between, but their terms in power were almost unanimously hailed as "golden times" for the citizenry. The names of these avatars who transformed their states into ones serving all stations of society live on even today, though their reputations have been slandered or their names nearly erased from history by their contemporaries. But what would happen if a national socialist state developed in America today? How would it be instituted? What changes would it bring to the nation? What would happen to society? What would the goals of the new state be? How would the party be organized? What ideals should its Leader exemplify? What is to be done with the corrupt judiciary? What kind of budget will a new National Socialist Party and its affiliates need? How would local chapters be organized? How will initiates be chosen? More info →
Unknown Feed- Unknown Feed
- Amerika
- Why Your Society is Transitioning to Parliamentary MonarchismWe know democracy is on its last legs because it across the world democracies are deeply in debt, experiencing social instability, suffering from falling birthrates, and cracking down on dissent. These things happen when a system is dying just like the Soviets faded away or the French Revolution obliterated itself. This means that alternatives from […]
- Why Your Society is Transitioning to Parliamentary Monarchism
Category Archives: Interesting Items
Style Against Democracy
Its been a bit sparse in content here lately – the website needs to be glammed a bit, so here’s a suggestion from Von Thronstahl. Style Against Democracy.
Bad art and anti-intellectualism is the reason the (Old, New, or True) Right never gets anywhere. And remember, Hitler was an artist with a love of Wagner, a non-drinker, vegetarian and patron of fine architecture. So when Von Thronstahl says ‘Return your Revolt Back into Style’ they mean take the political Right back to its original form in the 1920s where politics was used as an ‘art-form’.
HEIDEGGER’S ROOTS: NIETZSCHE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE GREEKS
HEIDEGGER’S ROOTS: NIETZSCHE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE GREEKS
Charles Bambach has added an important contribution to the growing literature on Heidegger’s involvement with and relationship to National Socialism.[1] Following up on an earlier book that placed Heidegger’s thought in the German historicist tradition, Bambach offers a close reading of Heidegger’s texts both in the immediate historical and political context of the years in which they were written and in the context of Heidegger’s overall project of deconstructing the Western metaphysical tradition of calculative thinking that objectifies beings and transforms all forms of existence into resources to gain mastery over the earth.[2] Avoiding both a prosecutorial or an apologetic approach, Bambach suggests that the question that needs to be answered is not, “was Heidegger a Nazi?” but rather, “what kind of National Socialism did he aspire to establish?” (p. xv).
As Hans Sluga had already done to a more limited extent in Heidegger’s Crisis (1993), Bambach reads Heidegger in the context of his “dialogues” and “conversations” with many of his voelkisch contemporaries, including, most prominently, the Nietzschean philosopher Alfred Baeumler, the anti-Nietzschean educator Ernst Krieck, Nazi philosophers Hans Heyse, Kurt Hildebrandt, and Franz Boehm, as well as a host of minor figures, such as Hans Haertle, a leading functionary of the Amt Rosenberg, or Richard and Max Oehler, Elisabeth Foerster-Nietzsche’s official heirs as the administrators of the nazified Nietzsche Archive in Weimar. Despite their many differences, Heidegger shared with his voelkisch contemporaries the conviction that only a Volk rooted in its own earth “can summon the historical energy necessary for embracing and transforming its own destiny” (p. xx). Denying that Heidegger’s philosophy and politics can be easily separated (thereby contradicting not only Heidegger’s own efforts to portray his advocacy of National Socialism in 1933-1934 as the temporary aberration of an apolitical thinker but also the efforts of others to portray him as an opportunist who joined the party out of expediency, not conviction), Bambach identifies “an enduring structure within Heidegger’s work that can provide a meaningful historical context within and against which to read Heidegger’s texts, a context provided by ‘roots’ and ‘autochthony'”
Who Are These Losers?
Interesting article on the origins of these groups and their lack of knowledge about who and what they harrass.