Firstly, this is not as the SPLC states, an argument between ‘neo-nazi’s’. It is an argument between rivals with different ideologies. It is a grievous error to assume that everyone on the ‘Right’ agrees mindlessly. What is at work here is a separation between the intellectual New Right and the non-intellectual “Neo-Nazi” style internet based thugs who seem to believe that using slang like ‘Jewger’ renders them credible to normal, sane people.
The second issue is that this is an argument about ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ – i.e. is a readership of ten thousand people with low social status (i.e. internet thugs) of importance, or is a quality readership of a few hundred powerful people (i.e. members of parliament and government) more useful? I think you already know the answer.
One must have the popularity of the working class behind them – but one also must have the planners, the writers, the creators and the artists to build a system. It is their duty to build a society for the workers, and it is the duty for the workers to support them. The thinkers have always held a position of prominence in any society, just as the artists also exert influence.
Alternative Right, the Traditionalist Youth Network, Radix, Counter Currents, Dark Enlightenment, etc are the intellectuals – the system builders if you will – and without the thinkers, everything is doomed. Running around skulking on internet forums and cringing in fear every time a Jew appears is not the hallmark of vigour or health – if the Third Reich failed to endure the first time, why would it succeed when it is nothing but an internet forum full of poor taste jokes about the Jews? It won’t and the classic 1980’s type skinhead sites are just a waste of everyone’s time. Internet thuggery based on an erroneous interpretation of ‘Nazism’ is the single biggest political waste of time there is. A carrot has more chance of winning an election.
Without the thinkers, these people are destined to failure – the Linder’s & the Anglin’s will all fade into fabulous obscurity, having achieved nothing but the creation of a website full of poor taste jokes about Jews. I for one am glad Bill was banished from VNN because it’s a terrible bore to have to read through the content there. Moreover, the intellectuals don’t need these people either – in fact they are better off without them, because they are a serious impediment to credibility with wider demographics.
Thirdly – there are those of us who struggle for dominance, and those of us who acquire it naturally. If one has to fight for power, then they will never achieve it. And so adieu to the people and sites who believe they can succeed on their own without any thinkers, creators and artists. I wish you well and drink a toast to your success in discovering which member of your online forum is a secret Jew, and to your inability to understand that if you want to live in a place with caucasian inhabitants, all you have to do is pack up and move…to the North West Front for example, or to other rural areas.
My final assessment is that it is of our benefit not to weakly acquiesce to the presence of the internet thugs and that by distancing ourselves from such websites strengthens our position rather than weakening it. The Right must cleaned and made respectable again, and not left to be controlled by individuals who seek to actively make themselves detestable to the mainstream. Richard Spencer may have had a failure in Hungary, but at least he tried.
(NB: My ideas do not necessarily reflect nor agree with those of Bill White.)